The Importance of Sleep and Fresh Air

To reduce excessive infant mortality, theories about mothercraft were being taught to teenage girls.   Practical lessons in mothercraft, held in nurseries and infant welfare centres, were attended by girls aged between twelve and fourteen (the school leaving age).  Classes not only helped older girls in the day-today dealings with their younger siblings, but directed their instincts and emotions towards future motherhood.  Infant welfare superintendents taught the lessons, using babies – rather than a doll. 

‘Mothercraft for School Girls’ 1914¹, published by Macmillan, covered a range of topics.

20200724_142620

On the importance of sleep and fresh air, it was suggested that a baby should sleep alone in a cot from the day it is born since a baby might be suffocated through overlaying in a bed with its parents.   A baby sleeping alone rests and sleeps better because it is not disturbed by other people moving.   Baby should never be rocked to sleep; it should be put in its cot and left alone; it will soon get into good habits and go to sleep. 

20200724_142743

It was noted that cots and cradles were relatively cheap, but some mothers could not afford these, so a banana crate, which was the ideal shape of a cradle was suggested, and could be bought from a fruiter for as little as 2d.  The banana crate could be made into a very pretty cradle for very little money; two and half yards of  green and white muslin as covering, at 2d a yard, and two yards of unbleached calico at 3d could be stitched up and filled with finely chopped straw.  This would make a comfortable, clean soft bed, and could be renewed every week by emptying out the old straw, washing the cover, and filling it freshly with straw.  In this way the bed, which was likely to be wetted, could be kept sweet.  A banana cot was cheap, light and easy to carry up and down the stairs, where it could be placed on two chairs close to the mother’s bed at night.

Where there was a choice of rooms for the baby to sleep in, it was recommended that the room should be the most airy and sunny room in the house, and the windows of the room should always be kept open.  It was essential for babies to have plenty of fresh air –“… like plants, they thrive in sunshine and air!” ¹

¹  Mothercraft for School Girls’1914, published by Macmillan. 

Anne Hornsby – Born in Birmingham 1914-24 Project Volunteer

Early training of health visitors and the development of the professional body

20200501_145626Birmingham was one of the pioneers of maternity care and infant welfare provision prior to the War, when health and infant welfare were delivered through a combination of voluntary and municipal schemes.  Project volunteer, Jan, has used some research from the Wellcome Foundation Library to chart the development of the the professional bodies affiliated to health visiting. 

At the dawn of the 20th century there were many improvements in the health of the nation, but infant mortality was still unacceptably high.  There was involvement with Sanitary Inspectors but it became clear that there was a need for a professional worker who could go into homes as a friend and work with mothers and focus on child care.  Health Visiting developed as a branch of Sanitary Inspection.

An early example of training was a two year course at Kings College in London.  The first year included, introductory science, a study of the function of life and household science.  The second year focused on hygiene, sanitary law and building construction, and practical work among infants or hospitals.                                              There were other qualifications acceptable at this time:

  • Sanitary Inspectors
  • Midwives – Certificate of Midwives Board (CMB) often at own expense
  • Fully trained nurse with or without CMB
  • District Nurses often with only a few months hospital training

In addition, there were people who had degrees and some who were judged by their letters and grammar.

Many Health Visitors were so poorly paid in some instances that they had to take other jobs such as writing articles, lecturing or coaching students for exams.

The history of the professional body began in 1898 with the founding of the Women’s Sanitary Inspectors Association.  It was based in London where there were 7 sanitary workers.  By 1906 there 63 workers and an invitation to join went out to the provinces.  Its aims have remained constant :

To safeguard the interests and improve the status of women public health workers and to promote the interchange of relevant and technical knowledge.                                     

It was renamed in 1915 as the Women’s Sanitary Inspectors and Health Visitors’ Association to reflect the increase of health visitors who had joined.

In 1908, The Royal Sanitary Institute began to set examinations in Health Visiting.

In 1912, the first Provincial Centre of the Association was founded in Birmingham.  It was affiliated to the National Union of Women Workers in 1918.

In 1922, the Association initiated a course of training and an examination for the Board of Education Diploma for Health Visitors.

The Ministry of Health became responsible for the training of health visitors in 1925.

In 1930, the Women’s Public Health Association was formed to reflect numbers of others working in the Public Health field.  It also shared connections with parallel professions such as nursing, social work, district nursing and midwifery.

The Health Visitors Association was formed in 1962.  By now the health visiting role had extended to the health of the whole family, with social as well as medical aspects.

Jan Wright

References:

Welcome Foundation Library – Manual for Health Visitors and Infant Welfare Workers. Edited by Edith Eve, formerly Chief Health Visitor and Sanitary Inspector, Holborn 1921

“THE GLAXO BABY BOOK” dedicated to everyone who loves a baby

The Glaxo Baby BookThese illustrations are from the Fifteenth Edition of the Glaxo Baby Book published in November 1922.  The frontispiece states that since its first publication in 1908, more than one million copies of the book had been issued.  This edition runs to 150 pages, is well-indexed and includes many photographs of ‘bonnie Glaxo boys and girls’.

The story of Glaxo began with Joseph Nathan, the son of a London tailor who emigrated to Australia in 1853, at the age of 17.  After a few years, he moved to New Zealand and joined his brother-in-law in a general merchandising business, becoming a partner in 1861.

In 1873, after the partnership was dissolved, Joseph Nathan and Co. was established.  Strong trade links with London continued and an office there was opened in 1876.

Skimmed milk was a by-product from the Nathan dairy business in New Zealand – already successfully shipping butter to the UK – and proved a breakthrough for the family business.  A purpose-built factory in New Zealand produced milk powder that was sold mainly in bulk for catering and military customers.  But with the growing use of the powder as an infant food, the Nathan family changed the name of the product from Defiance Dried Milk to Glaxo brand of milk powder, a name registered in 1906.

To manage the UK promotion of the new product, Joseph Nathan brought back from New Zealand the youngest of his three sons, Alec Nathan, but it was not until 1911, during a health scare involving liquid milk, that the powdered variety was seen to be a safer alternative for the bottle feeding of babies.

WP_20191219_001

In 1908, The Glaxo department of Joseph Nathan and Co opened in London and the first “baby book” was published.  The “Glaxo Baby Book” was a unique publication that aimed to answer questions from mothers about infant feeding and care.  The book, which continued until the 1970s, provided practical advice from nursing staff and reflected the advances in medical and nutritional science.  “Glaxo – the Food that Builds Bonnie Babies” became a familiar slogan in advertising campaigns of the time.

World War I increased the demand for dried milk and concern for the quality, safety and consistency of dried milk led to technical control improvements.  In 1924, the vitamin D preparation Ostelin became Glaxo’s first pharmaceutical product following the obtaining of rights to a process of extracting vitamin D from fish-liver oil.

Alison Smith

Profile of an Infant Welfare Lady Superintendent

MS 4101 Greet & Sparkhill IWC Annual Report 1917 Cover
Sparkhill and Greet Maternity and Infant Welfare Centre Annual Report 1918 [MS4101]

Our researchers have been investigating many individuals who played their part in maternity services.  Born in Birmingham project volunteer Laurie,  sheds light on the fascinating story of Miriam Shewell. 

Miriam Shewell, born 11 September 1875¹, she was the eldest of 10 children of Caroline and Joseph Shewell, an iron bridge manufacturer who, at 34, employed 40 men and 6 boys.  The family lived in Hurworth, Durham, with a general servant and nursemaid².

Miriam and her three younger sisters were sent to Ackworth School in Yorkshire³, which was a Quaker boarding school.

In May 1903, Miriam obtained a midwifery qualification from the London Obstetrical Society and in the following year she was enrolled at no.615 on the Midwives Roll ⁴.

In 1911, a visitor in Cheshire on census night, Miriam’s occupation was described a ‘Monthly Nurse’ ⁵.

WP_20200108_001
Interior of a maternity ward (1913) Wellcome Collection {25/01 552273i}

From Bristol Settlement, Miriam was appointed as the third Lady Superintendent of Sparkhill and Greet Maternity and Infant Welfare Centre, and took up her duties in February 1919 ⁶.  The Centre had opened in April 1916 and the first Superintendent left after 18 months to get married, while the second stayed barely 12 months. Miriam seems to have provided a much-needed period of stability in the management of the Centre and her work is mentioned several times in local newspapers.

In 1920, Greet Centre Committee took the unusual step of asking a small group of mothers they knew well, to join the Workers’ Committee and to help in the work of the centre.  Miriam Shewell said “They know all about their own districts in a way we could never know it, and understand the superstitions and difficulties and tiresomenesses in their own streets. We find them full of common sense and splendid suggestions.” ⁷

During Baby Week 1923, Miriam produced a propaganda play ‘Danger Ahead’ in which she played a grandma offering advice to a young couple on the dubious basis of “’aving ‘ad 9 and buried 8!”

The same article reports that Miss Shewell had been asked to write a series of standardised health talks to be used in welfare centres nationwide. In the following year’s Baby Week programme, the paper reported that the ‘ever-enterprising’ Greet Centre proposed baby-bathing demonstrations in small relays by a nurse, and Miriam invited mothers to volunteer their babies, promising that no baby would be bathed more than once! ⁹

Miriam Shewell lived in College Road, Moseley when she first arrived in Birmingham and later moved to Tetley Road. By 1925, her youngest sister had joined her (10) and in 1939 they lived in Hall Green where Miriam is described as Retired Infant Welfare Superintendent.

She lived there until her death aged 74, on 6 August 1950. (11)

                                                                                                            Laurie Spencer

1 1939 England and Wales Register Ancestry
2 England Census 1881 Ancestry
3 England Census 1891 Ancestry
4 Midwives Roll 1931 Ancestry
5 England Census 1911 Ancestry
6 Sparkhill and Greet Maternity and Infant Welfare Centre Annual Report 1918 Birmingham Archives MS4101
7 Birmingham Daily Gazette 5 March 1920 British Newspaper Archive
8 Birmingham Daily Gazette 4 July 1923 British Newspaper Archive
9 Birmingham Daily Gazette 1 July 1924 British Newspaper Archive
10 Electoral Register 1925 Ancestry
11 England and Wales National Probate Calendar Ancestry

The development of health visiting in Birmingham

Jan chose to focus on the increase in working woman who visited women and children in their homes and in infant welfare centres to facilitate improvements in their health.

The 1914-1924 period saw a large increase in the number of health & infant visitors as a result of concern about infant mortality rates, but also in response to the Notification of Births Act in 1915 requiring that the Medical Officer of Health (MOH) be notified of all births within 36 hours.

The increasing number of infant welfare centres (IWCs) became the focus for infant health visitors, working entirely with mothers and their infant children.  By the end of the war there was a well established staff of 61 infant visitors attached to infant welfare centres and 33 health visitors who worked with mothers and infants outside of the welfare centre boundaries as well as with older children.

The development of health visiting in Birmingham can be discovered in the Minutes of the Birmingham Health Committee.  In October 1898, Dr Alfred Hill, the Medical Officer of Health (MOH) was asked to obtain information from several towns about the engagement of women officers who were working to prevent infant mortality.  Based on his findings, agreement was reached to appoint 4 lady health visitors in 1899 to work almost entirely in the 4 poorest districts of Birmingham.  The successful 4 candidates would earn 25/- a week and be provided with a uniform.  The local authority would fund them.  These first health visitors developed from the existing role of sanitary inspectors or visitors.  They worked primarily to promote health and provide health education – working at the level of the infant, their family, and community.  Their priority was to improve sanitation and reduce infectious disease – a clear distinction from nursing.

In a newspaper report in 1901, Dr Hill spoke of the ‘capital and successful results of these appointments’ and his intention to increase the number of posts.  He noted that ’the lady health visitors have duties quite distinct from sanitary inspectors but they also report defects in housing and gently induce the poorer classes to comply with sanitary edicts.’  He cited ventilation as being a stumbling block often leading to ‘House Sickness’.  Health visitors identified and referred 1,000 chimneys that needed unblocking, as well as 3,000 windows that needed repair.       

By 1902 with an increase of staff, 12 districts within Birmingham were formed and health visitors were required to visit all houses of 3 rooms or less where a birth had taken place, making repeat visits where necessary, enquiring into the circumstances of all infant deaths, and reporting any cases of cruelty.  They distributed hand bills explaining management of the house and yard and precautions to be taken against measles, diarrhoea, typhoid and consumption and stressed the importance of breast feeding.  They carried disinfectant powder and emphasised the need for cleanliness and also of thrift and temperance.  They should be ‘well educated’ and physically strong women.  The key was to go into the home as ‘a friend and not to find causes for reproach’.

In 1903, Dr John Robertson became the MOH for Birmingham.  His annual reports contain details of health visiting activity provided by the Superintendent Health Visitor, Blanche Gardiner.  In 1912, she was pleased to announce that the number of health visitors had risen to 19, one visitor for each of the 19 districts and 4 infant visitors.  The 4 infant visitors focused their work entirely on infant welfare.  The 19 health visitors also worked with mothers and infants but had other responsibilities at this time including receiving all the names of babies born in their district and visiting jointly with the infant visitor if required.   Blanche Gardiner visited every household where an infant had died of diarrhoea or contracted ophthalmic neonatorum.  She assessed housing conditions, and if dirty or insanitary housing was detected, she would make suggestions for improvement.  She also worked with older children and families.  She had a duty to report any negligence or malpractice shown by midwives.  In 1913, there were 16,219 visits made by infant visitors and health visitors.

Jan Wright

 

Abortion in Birmingham: the hidden realities

We have been investigating many aspects of maternity services as part of our project but, of course, then as now, not all pregnancies were wanted.  At our launch event back in September one of the visitors to the pop-up exhibition was Cambridge student Milly Coleman who has been researching the history of abortion in Birmingham. Here, appropriately on International Women’s Day, is a summary of her research. 

Last summer, I spent a few weeks in the Wolfson Archives researching backstreet abortions and the women who had them in Birmingham in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century.

At that time, working class women wanted to limit the size of their family for a multitude of reasons, such as preventing overcrowding and maintaining the living conditions of their families.Moreover, industrialisation allowed women to work, giving them an extra incentive not to have more children.

To limit the size of their families, working class women had two legal options:

  • Abstinence
  • Contraception (which was unreliable and expensive).

Alternatively, but illegally, they could have an abortion if they did fall pregnant. All abortions were technically illegal before 1967, so finding records of them presented a challenge because abortionists necessarily needed to be secretive.

By criminalising the act of abortion, lawmakers created a stigma and forced women to risk their own health to avoid having a child. Additionally, they could not report malpractice or blackmail, and even if something went wrong many were reluctant to seek medical assistance.

The average woman would not have talked about procuring an abortion, but ‘bringing on a period’ using colloquially named chemicals – ‘bitter apples’ was colocynth and ‘hikey pikey’ was hiera picra – or using household chemicals such as washing soda or turpentine. [1]

Consequently, it was challenging to recover the stories of women who had abortions, as abortionists did not keep incriminating written records.

Inevitably then, many surviving documents originate from cases where the process went wrong and can be found in the medical records of Birmingham Women’s Hospital and Birmingham Maternity Hospital.

Birmingham Women’s Hospital served ‘a large number of poor women in Birmingham suffering from ailments peculiar to their sex, for whom no adequate means of treatment existed’, and was the largest women’s hospital in England around 1900.[2]

The annual reports of both the maternity and women’s hospitals demonstrate the patronising tones that the upper middle class governing board took towards their working class patients. The charities undoubtedly had good intentions and did very important work, but that middle class judgement is clear in the annual reports.

Through my research I wanted to understand who the women having abortions were, since so much of the contemporary debate focused on either cases of rape, or sex workers.

The voices of poor married women who couldn’t afford another child were largely overlooked in arguments about the legalisation of abortion, so I tried to focus on average women from Birmingham to counter this. Their stories have been accessed via medical records and the records of social workers and abortion reformers.

In the Report of the National Birth Rate Commission, written in 1916, Mrs [Florence Carol] Ring, a Birmingham-based social worker, estimated that one in four poor women attempted an abortion at some point, although this is likely to be an underestimate since a conspiracy of silence existed around naming abortionists and methods.

Mrs Ring provides a unique perspective as she had the trust of the working class community she served, and she describes that ‘the poor begin by having children and then resort to abortion later on when the family increases in size’. [3] I wanted to understand a little more about the lives of these women and their motivations.

I used the In Patient Register at Birmingham Women’s Hospital to create a profile of the women admitted to the hospital due to a failed or complicated abortion. The staff recorded the name, age, marital status and address of patients, as well as the occupation of their husband or father if they were unmarried.

The cases of abortion recorded in the Register represent a tiny minority of all abortions, as women risked arrest by going to hospital, but they offer useful data on the age and marital status of patients.

From 1912-1916, 87.4% of the women admitted for complications from abortions were married. Although the average age fell slightly when World War One began, the lowest it reached was 29.6 in 1916. [4]

This illustrates that in Birmingham, married women who already had children were the principal demographic having abortions.

These women had abortions out of desperation, since any reaction to an unwanted pregnancy had its own dangers and potential stigma.

Working class women in Birmingham faced overcrowding and a lack of sanitation in the slum-like ‘back-to-backs’.

Miss Martin, a midwife from the Selly Oak area of Birmingham with nine years of experience, testified in 1916 that some landlords refused to house larger families so the birth of another baby could lead to homelessness for the whole family.

In addition, exposure to chemicals in industrial workplaces and previous births in quick succession meant that women’s health was put at risk by further pregnancies.

Brookes argues that contraception and abortion were essential to maintaining living standards, yet legally and in popular rhetoric, the health and sanity of women was portrayed as secondary to the unborn baby.

Women therefore faced a choice between abstinence, contraception, keeping the baby, adoption or abortion. Upper class voices criminalised and degraded the mother’s body regardless of her choice, leaving no easy solution. And in many cases, the cost and ease of access to abortion made it the best option for many working class women and their families.

Milly Coleman

[1] P. Knight, ‘Women and Abortion in Victorian and Edwardian England’, History Workshop 4:57 (1977), 57-68 at p58
[2]  Article about Bingley Hall Charity Exhibition, Volume of press cuttings relating to Birmingham Hospitals (Birmingham: Wolfson Centre, HC WH/5/1/1, Library of Birmingham, c.1900). The headline and author of this article was cut off when the volume was compiled.
[3] ‘Testimony of Mrs Ring’, The Declining Birth Rate: Its Causes and Effects – Report of the National Birth-Rate Commission (London: Chapman and Hall Ltd, 1916), 277-281 at p280
[4] In Patient Register of Birmingham Women’s Hospital, vol.3 (Birmingham: Wolfson Centre, HC WH/3/1/3, Library of Birmingham, 1912-1916)
[5] ’Testimony of Miss Martin‘, The Declining Birth Rate: Its Causes and Effects – Report of the National Birth-Rate Commission (London: Chapman and Hall Ltd, 1916), 273-277 at p274
[6] B. Brookes, Abortion in England 1900-67 (London: Croom Helm, 1988), p12

Children’s Hospital Brick League – an early form of crowdfunding

Birmingham Children's Hospital, Ladywood 1923.

Today, crowdfunding is the practice of funding a project by raising small amounts of money from a large number of people, usually via the Internet.  Some would see this as a redefinition of the fundraising landscape.  But looking at the history of the Children’s Hospital in Birmingham we see a much earlier experiment of a similar kind.

BIB Brick League event 1923An effective fundraising campaign in the early twentieth century was “the Children’s Hospital Brick League, which allowed children to purchase and even participate in the laying of bricks which were engraved with each donor’s initials”.  The hope was that such a scheme would foster close and continuing links between children and the hospital.  A new children’s hospital was planned in Ladywood and initialised bricks were laid by 476 children themselves ahead of the opening in 1916.

BIB Children's Hospital 1923

Local newspapers and suburban magazines included reports of the ‘throughput’ of the children’s hospital and regular fundraising events were held to promote the Children’s Hospital Brick League for many years to come.

Alison Smith

Quote from:     J Reinarz, ‘Charitable bodies: The funding of Birmingham’s voluntary hospitals in the nineteenth century’, 2006.

Some of the latest project findings presented at The Gunmakers Arms

An audience of friends, family, FoBAH members and interested parties joined Born in Birmingham 1914-24 project volunteers for an informative evening at The Gunmakers Arms last night.

Topics talked about included Birth Control, Infant Mortality, Adoption, Midwives, Infant Welfare Centres, Baby Week and Health Visitors.

The evening revealed a whole host of fascinating information discovered during researchers’ sessions in the Archives and Collections of the Library of Birmingham.

Thanks to Liz for coordinating a wonderful evening.

Talk at Gunmakers’ Arms Tues 4th Feb 7pm

“Born in Birmingham 1914-24” Talk at the Gunmakers Arms on Tuesday 4th February 2020

What was life like if you were born in Birmingham 1914 -24?  Join our NHLF research volunteers for an informal talk which will shed light on this topic.

7.00pm on Tuesday 4th February 2020, at the Gunmakers Arms, 93 Bath Street, Birmingham, B4 6HG.

Booking is essential via Eventbrite:  https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/born-in-birmingham-1914-to-1924-maternity-midwives-and-infant-welfare-tickets-84803338067

Growing out of chaos

Living life differently

Midwives Chronicle: The Heritage Blog of the Royal College of Midwives

Midwifery history from the Royal College of Midwives

Discover WordPress

A daily selection of the best content published on WordPress, collected for you by humans who love to read.

Longreads

Longreads : The best longform stories on the web

WordPress.com News

The latest news on WordPress.com and the WordPress community.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started